Glenn Beck defends the three-fifths clause.
See, the problem is, he's not right, he just sounds right. He's thrown a few facts into his insane, I-draw-my-conclusions-based-on-infrared-signals-from-the-planet-Xegacilat condescension, and it takes hours of surgically precise work to tease it all apart.
Despite my near-constant state of hyperbolicity (I made a new word!), there is a nigh-imperceptibly small number of people I truly hate--as in abhor their very existence so much that, if I were guaranteed to get away with it scot-free, I would have no moral qualms about killing them with my bare hands.
I'm just saying.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-16 05:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-16 05:50 pm (UTC)EYE. F***ING. ROLL.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-16 05:55 pm (UTC)I'm kind of flabbergasted not by his reinterpretation of the founding fathers' motivations, not just because he's inferring what they intended, but the fact that he is actually changing who the founding fathers were. By his interpretations, only the anti-slavery guys involved with the setting up of the country were actually founding fathers. Those others (i.e., over half the continental congress) were just guys hanging around with their slaves being evil.
Yeah.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-16 05:55 pm (UTC)What's good for General Motors is good for America!
no subject
Date: 2009-12-16 05:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-16 06:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-16 06:33 pm (UTC)I was reading your lj when Geekboy came up, and I just said, "Glenn Beck ha an interesting interpretation of reality." He's thinking GB is either insincere and putting everyone on or entirely insane.
I'm not sure which I believe. I maintain the "interesting interpretation of reality," in either case. O'Reilly I think is complete sincere, which is kind of sad since he's such an angry guy; I want to give him a sno cone to cheer him up or something. GB is just so...earnest. And crazy.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-16 06:37 pm (UTC)In conclusion: Glenn Beck is still an asshat.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-16 06:40 pm (UTC)Well, that's what I said - he takes a few facts, and then makes an eye-crossing wtf of it with his, uh, "brain."
no subject
Date: 2009-12-16 06:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-16 06:41 pm (UTC)There is something giggle-inducing about that phrase beyond the obvious. I'm still trying to parse how it works.
Yeah, his grip on the facts=tenuous.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-16 06:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-16 06:54 pm (UTC)I'm now picturing some sort of strange Dr. Horrible/1776 crossover sequel/prequel, where George Washington rides in on Bad Horse, is electrified by Franklin's miraculous lightning rod (in two-part harmony), thereby making Bad Horse IMMORTAL!
And then they hang around owning slaves and being evil.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-16 07:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-16 07:09 pm (UTC)Ahahaha! :)
no subject
Date: 2009-12-16 07:39 pm (UTC)Blerg. So gross.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-16 09:07 pm (UTC)What a nincowpoop! What an ultramaroon.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-16 09:48 pm (UTC)I... think I just went cross-eyed.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-16 09:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-16 10:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-16 10:06 pm (UTC)I'll have to see if there's something analogous to do a Yuletide stocking-stuffer. *g*
no subject
Date: 2009-12-16 10:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-17 12:38 am (UTC)