For our friends in foreign lands
Nov. 3rd, 2004 12:09 pm"Americans."
We do hear this a lot from people in other countries. "Americans" think this, "Americans" do that. But - there are 300 million people in America. Three hundred million. And they are more diverse than in any other nation, anywhere, ever.
European populations, for comparison, totalling 300 million:
France: 60 million
England: 60 million
Germany: 80 million
Spain: 40 million
Italy: 60 million
Just a gentle reminder - before you are next tempted to say "Americans this" or "Americans that" - remember that number. And remember this one: 55 million. That's how many Americans voted for Kerry and/or against Bush. More than all the people in Spain. Close to all the people in France, or England, or Italy. ALL of them. 55,128,439, actually. And not all the votes are counted yet.
Please don't discount over fifty-five million people because their country has more voters who went the other way. And please - think before you say "Americans".
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
We do hear this a lot from people in other countries. "Americans" think this, "Americans" do that. But - there are 300 million people in America. Three hundred million. And they are more diverse than in any other nation, anywhere, ever.
European populations, for comparison, totalling 300 million:
France: 60 million
England: 60 million
Germany: 80 million
Spain: 40 million
Italy: 60 million
Just a gentle reminder - before you are next tempted to say "Americans this" or "Americans that" - remember that number. And remember this one: 55 million. That's how many Americans voted for Kerry and/or against Bush. More than all the people in Spain. Close to all the people in France, or England, or Italy. ALL of them. 55,128,439, actually. And not all the votes are counted yet.
Please don't discount over fifty-five million people because their country has more voters who went the other way. And please - think before you say "Americans".
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-03 10:39 am (UTC)Love you. Love your Princess Bride quote.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-03 10:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-03 11:08 am (UTC)All of them? Really?
The language has come to allow the international use of "Americans" to serve as shorthand for "citizens of the United States", yes - but that doesn't negate the fact that many of us do know the various countries which make up North, Central, Latin and South America and their overlap. Many don't, but many do.
*points to original post*
no subject
Date: 2004-11-03 11:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-03 11:47 am (UTC)Someone can be called both French and European, both Chinese and Asian, Egyptian and African. But if you are from the United States of America, you are both American and... American.
It is, unfortunately, a problem with the language.
Not the people.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-03 11:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-03 11:59 am (UTC)"The Americas" comprise more than one country.
So do "South America", "Central America", and "North America".
"America", by its lonesome like that, always means the United States of America, just as "Americans" always means "people from the United States of America".
It is hardly our fault that the language is set up as it is; being a pedant about it, particularly in this instance, makes you seem like something of a jerk.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-03 01:27 pm (UTC)Actually, I've been using US & US citizens mostly. Works fine.
And FWIW, I've spent quite a bit of time posting and commenting reminding my disheartened friends in the US that *no*, it's not a unanymous thing by far. So for what it's worth, there's at least one friend in a foreign (to you) land who cares about that. Important to remember for everyone, I think.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 03:26 pm (UTC)I've had multiple discussions on this subject with people from the U.S. and from elsewhere in the world, and many from the latter group (including Canadians) said they couldn't care less if U.S. folks call themselves "Americans." But some do mind, and it's not worth it to me to offend people or make it seem like I think my country is more important or exclusive than it is.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-03 05:47 pm (UTC)No it doesn't. Only to Americans.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-03 10:45 am (UTC)Brava.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-03 11:22 am (UTC)The thing is, deep down, I wonder how many voters were influenced *against* Kerry by foreign interference, namely those Brits who wrote letters to undecided voters (excuse me, like *they* have any room to preach?), and that stupid Bin Laden videotape. I can imagine people voting *for* Bush just to make a point.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-03 12:31 pm (UTC)Isn't that even more idiotic? I agree with
no subject
Date: 2004-11-03 02:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-03 06:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-03 07:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-03 11:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-03 11:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-03 12:03 pm (UTC)Got here from a link in another lj. Just wanted to say *applause* and amen.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-03 12:57 pm (UTC)...but the truth of the matter is that when someone says "america" or "americans", no one thinks that they are talking about mexicans, canadians, brazilians, chileans or whatever peoples of the countries on the north, central and south american continents.
i lived in mexico, and know that usa people were generally referred to as "americanos", "gringos" and "estaunidenses" - and the country as "estados unidos" mexicans were, well... "mexicanos".
the only thing i can ask is if "american" is not the proper term, then what should citizens of the united states be called (and no i'm not encouraging swearing!)
united states of americans?
usaians?
unitedstatesians? (kind of a translation of "estaunidenses")
i really would like to know if there is a real name being used to refer to people from the united states out there that is the reason why people are so hung up on why we are called "americans"...
no subject
Date: 2004-11-03 01:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-03 01:32 pm (UTC)I in no way implied that all Italians think the same things, or all English, or all French. My goal was to communicate the enormity of the population of this country, so that the parallel could be drawn. If 60 million people (all of France) have serious differences, then a country with five times that many people certainly don't all think alike.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-03 02:38 pm (UTC)i didn't think you were actually singling out the particular countries you named as being guilty of generalizing, i was only pointing out that you generalized by naming the countris as a whole as examples. (does that make sense? and now that i re-read the origianl post i realize that was me being nitpicky and i really have no clue how you could have written your example differently to apease my nitpicky mind)
Except that I do follow what goes on in other countries. I know that when 10% of the French voted for a close-minded bigot and hundreds of thousands of them took to the streets to protest even the chance of that person taking office. I know the Brits are far angrier with Tony Blair for committing England to the war on Iraq, by percentage, than Americans are with George Bush. I know that Italy is battling with itself over the separation of Church and State.
(snip)My goal was to communicate the enormity of the population of this country, so that the parallel could be drawn. If 60 million people (all of France) have serious differences, then a country with five times that many people certainly don't all think alike.
thank you for the clarification. this make more sense now regarding what you were trying to get across.
thanks! :)
no subject
Date: 2004-11-03 05:52 pm (UTC)Its important to remember.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-03 07:08 pm (UTC)America is an ideology. And a democracy. You cannot be an American and not be complicit in what America IS and what it does. That goes for each of us in our own country. How can it be otherwise?
no subject
Date: 2004-11-03 08:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-04 05:13 am (UTC)Neither of us are guitly of the insane evil of people who actually vote for him, or the sheer stupidity of people who didn't vote, but we are part of the process and partially responsible for the outcome.
That's what I'm 'saying'. What you say is no doubt different.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-04 07:04 am (UTC)Main Entry: com·plic·i·ty
Pronunciation: k&m-'pli-s(&-)tE
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural -ties
1 : association or participation in or as if in a wrongful act
2 : an instance of complicity
(from: http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=complicity)
no subject
Date: 2004-11-04 10:46 am (UTC)And on the "America to refer to USA issue", I don't quite get how people can say only citizens of the USA think and or say that. I just took a random look at papers from Britain and Canada and found that they refer to us as "America" and "Americans" also. So if it is a crime, well, we're not alone. And I'd like to know what we are suppose to use that's not incredibly awkward. Grrr.
I came here on a rec from another lj, btw.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-04 06:48 pm (UTC)And they are more diverse than in any other nation, anywhere, ever.
Really? I'm not saying that's not the case, but I'd like to see the stats that back that up.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-09 04:15 pm (UTC)I saw a reference to
*cough*
This is a fabulous post. I love this. Plus, the "Princess Bride" reference. *g*
Ahem, and might I know who made that yule log icon? Cause it rocks. A lot.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-09 04:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-09 04:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-09 04:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-09 04:38 pm (UTC)