Remember, bittorrent isn't a place. It's a method. A technique... and an open source one at that. So it cant dissappear simply because one company want to use it to distribute movies laden with Digital Rights Management and a hefty price tag. Provided that there are trackers with all your trusty downloads, you will be able to access this data which comes from other people's computers.
Take this with a pound of salt, for now. My understanding is, they're using a client similar to bittorrent overseas already, and... bundle in their own crappy DRM, to cause havoc on your computer, charge you the same amount as a dvd, for lesser quality, plus, none of the extras that would be included on a dvd make their way into the package.
But, if you let 50 people completely download from you, you get a free movie. Whatever. I remain intensely suspicious.
Well, yeah, cuz GEEKS aren't lame. WB is, for thinking they're offering a service. I'm not about to pay $15-20 bucks for a movie I can't burn to DVD and can't watch on more than one computer, when I could pick it up at Blockbuster for the same price with a label and a pretty cover, and watch it wherever I want. Hell, I'm unlikely to pay the $2 for a tv show under those conditions.
The question is: Does WB think making Bit torrent take down some movies will force us to choose to buy DVDs (uh, no; also: lame) or do they think we're so lazy we'd pay full price for cripple-ware (also no, also lame), or do they imagine we won't crack them and distribute them free or just go find the movies for free someplace else?
How can they make "bittorent" take anything down? Bittorrent isn't a place that stores anything. It's not even really a company. It's just a downloading technique, just like FTP is a technique for file transfer... the difference being that bittorrent is designed to spread amongst several downloaders. The only place that stores anything are the tracker sites that link to the files being shared by others but the tracker links and the downloading technique are not one and the same.
Which, to my mind, = Bit Torrent 1, WB 0. Because part of the deal is that BT will "remove" content that would infringe upon WB's rights. Uh, from WHERE, remove? From my computer? Is BT's founder gonna come knock on my door?
I don't think P2P means what WB thinks it means...
no subject
Date: 2006-05-10 06:30 pm (UTC)TV shows for a buck, though!
no subject
Date: 2006-05-10 06:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-10 07:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-10 07:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-10 10:13 pm (UTC)Also...bittorrent isn't the only place to get stuff....share? Pretty please? If you don't want to reply to a public entry, rout345@yahoo.com?
no subject
Date: 2006-05-10 10:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-11 01:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-10 11:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-11 01:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-10 06:40 pm (UTC)Although I laugh at the idea that B5 hasn't hit the internet.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-10 06:50 pm (UTC)But, if you let 50 people completely download from you, you get a free movie. Whatever. I remain intensely suspicious.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-10 07:46 pm (UTC)Lame.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-10 07:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-10 08:31 pm (UTC)The question is: Does WB think making Bit torrent take down some movies will force us to choose to buy DVDs (uh, no; also: lame) or do they think we're so lazy we'd pay full price for cripple-ware (also no, also lame), or do they imagine we won't crack them and distribute them free or just go find the movies for free someplace else?
Pretty lame anywhere you slice it.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-10 11:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-10 11:59 pm (UTC)I don't think P2P means what WB thinks it means...
no subject
Date: 2006-05-10 07:01 pm (UTC)