New York Post Says "Gay" Holmes May Backfire.
Okay, here's the thing.
We know that the homosocial/sexual subtext is there for us in Sherlock Holmes whether or not the director (or author) intends it to be. And we know that Downey is a goofball who's totally fine with it, and will say pretty much anything that comes into his great big brain. And we know (or, let's say, many of us agree) that Robert Downey Jr. and Jude Law are two attractive men who, if the behind-the-scenes photos and interviews are anything to go by, get on like a house (or crotch) on fire. (RDJ's crotch caught on fire during filming, he apparently leapt out of his seat shouting, basically, "My crotch is on fire!" and JL quick-thinkingly grabbed a nearby vase of flowers and threw it at his crotch, putting out the fire. No lie. Good thing whoever the set dresser was had actually put *water* in the vase.)
So, when Michael Medved goes all BRAINLESS STUPIDHEAD HOMOPHOBIC SCHMUCKFACE on us, writing "Who is going to want to see Downey Jr. and Law make out? I don't think it would be appealing to women," the only thing to do is comment on the column about how he's a brainless, stupidheaded, homophobic schmuckface who has no idea what would be appealing to women.
As many, many people have done over at the NY Post site.
I AM SO AMUSED. And I only see like, one name I recognize as a slash fan (though others mention it as a phenomenon Medved might want to look up on The Google.)
(NB: I am purposefully ignoring the part where the reviewer(s) read "they want to make the movie about Holmes's and Watson's relationship" and RDJ's larking about and immediately assume TEH GHEY IS GETTIN' ALL OVER SHERLOCK HOLMES. I am too tired to do anything involving rage against our society today. I'm not worried about missing the boat, though; I'm sure all the things to rage at will still be around when I've recovered.)
no subject
Date: 2009-08-05 05:18 pm (UTC)I am also really curious to know what on Earth they were trying to film that led to RDJ's crotch catching on fire.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-05 06:50 pm (UTC)*snrk* Hope it's on the blooper reel!
no subject
Date: 2009-08-05 07:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-05 07:04 pm (UTC)I googlesearched kirk slash spock and sent him the list that popped up.
No really. They do.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-05 05:19 pm (UTC)Bwahahahahahaha!
*deep breath*
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
no subject
Date: 2009-08-05 06:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-05 09:44 pm (UTC)And isn't Medved the critic who hit Roger Ebert with his festival binder a few months ago? Stay classy, NY Post.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-05 10:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-05 05:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-05 07:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-05 05:37 pm (UTC)*blinks* So...many...responses...
Someone needs to introduce Medved to fandom. Also, I have no trouble believing that Medved hasn't a clue what would appeal to women.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-05 05:56 pm (UTC)Such as "I sure do! With whipped cream, plz!"
no subject
Date: 2009-08-05 05:37 pm (UTC)Of course! Because there were NO HOMOS in Victorian times! Homosexuality is an invention of the liberal left to corrupt our young boys! *koff*
Love all the comments in support of the gay, though! It did my heart good. :)
no subject
Date: 2009-08-05 05:38 pm (UTC)OTOH, Michael Medved. What else needs to be said.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-05 05:57 pm (UTC)Ah, Michael Medved: you are to film commentary what George W. Bush is to, well, anything.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-05 06:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-05 06:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-05 06:47 pm (UTC)I need to send this bozo a link to pix from the last Yaoi con.
And yes, it's hilarious how skool is in session.
For the record, I'll pack spare panties and go see it in the theatre 3x if it's got onscreen tongue kissing between Downey/Law.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-05 07:43 pm (UTC)Because of course a man is the natural expert and judge concerning what would be appealing to women.
I really have no words. Well, I've thought of combining your "Flames On The Side Of My Face"* with your "Hulk Smash". Hurrr.
Disclaimer: The preceding was written by a man whose wife is a champion producer/consumer of slash and fanfic going back to the days of furtive mimeographs and short-lived glossy photocopy paper that smelled like turpentine.
*or perhaps "Flames On The Front Of My Crotch" would be more germane in this case...
no subject
Date: 2009-08-05 09:18 pm (UTC)FOR. THE. WIN.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-07 02:49 am (UTC)Um, where was I?
I find this especially fun because I think in many ways, with the pastiches and the fan clubs and the conventions and the cosplay and roleplaying, Sherlock Holmes was the first modern fandom. This needed to happen, obviously, to make everything come full circle.