tzikeh: (obey - hat - aretha - inaugural)
[personal profile] tzikeh

Al Franken proposed and won an amendment to the 2010 Defense Appropriations Bill, which states that the government will withhold any defense contracts from companies “if they restrict their employees from taking workplace sexual assault, battery and discrimination cases to court.” He proposed the amendment after the gang-rape of a woman working for Halliburton while in Iraq. After the rape, her rapists locked her in a shipping container for a day (possibly more) without food or water, and told her that if she left Iraq for medical treatment, she'd be fired.

And get this. After the victim managed to convince one of the men guarding the container to lend her his cell phone, Halliburton banned cell-phone use by any employee in Iraq.

She decided to pursue the case in court, even though (get this) Halliburton's employment contract stipulates that sexual assault allegations would only be heard in private arbitration, without jury, judge, public record, or transcript of the proceedings. To my (hah) AMAZEMENT, the DOJ would not press charges

If the vote had gone by strict party line, it would have passed 58-40.

It passed 68-30.

Now, I'm not super-over-excited about this, because, this vote is kind of a no-brainer, and while I'd like to believe that those ten Republican votes are from Senators who voted their consciences, it's possible (only possible, and yes, call me a cynic) that the votes were from Senators who won thanks to the female vote, and don't want to do anything to endanger it.

But TEN? Talk about bi-partisan support.

A list of all senators and their votes.

What I want to see is a plethora of tv ads highlighting this vote from the Dem candidates challenging the 30 "Nay" Repubs for mid-terms. The GOP will call them "smear" ads and "mud-slinging"--which they still don't comprehend is not the case if the ad is a) not ad hominem, and b) THE FUCKING TRUTH, YOU FUCKS.

Geez. That Al Franken. What a joke of a Senator.

Date: 2009-10-08 01:44 pm (UTC)
ratcreature: WTF!? (WTF!?)
From: [personal profile] ratcreature
How can it even be legal to put clauses in contracts that prevent you from pressing charges for crimes?

Date: 2009-10-08 01:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tzikeh.livejournal.com
Employees can press charges privately. The military has this too; no crimes committed within the armed forces can be heard in a criminal court.

Date: 2009-10-08 02:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] speaks.livejournal.com
Where did the 8 extra senators come from?

Date: 2009-10-08 02:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tzikeh.livejournal.com
Where did the 8 extra senators come from?

From my pre-coffee brain.

(D'oh -- editing now.)

Date: 2009-10-08 02:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] speaks.livejournal.com
Feel free to delete my snarky comment once edited.

Date: 2009-10-08 02:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tzikeh.livejournal.com
Not at all! I didn't think it was snarky--just pointing out a "whuh?" error.

Date: 2009-10-08 02:08 pm (UTC)
ext_1895: (Default)
From: [identity profile] lunaris1013.livejournal.com
I was pleased to see Sen. Lugar as one of the Rs with a conscience. He's represented Indiana for a long time and really has no worries about being unseated. He's an old school Repub that didn't drink the Wingnut Kool-Aid. I respect him far more than our Dem senator, the despicable Evan Byah. At least Lugar has principles.

Date: 2009-10-08 02:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tzikeh.livejournal.com
Well then, go Lugar! I welcome any Republicans still in the Reality-Based Community.

Date: 2009-10-08 02:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] phoenix64.livejournal.com
I'm curious what arguments they came up for against the amendment. I mean, really?

Date: 2009-10-08 02:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tzikeh.livejournal.com
No argument against the amendment, I'm sure. They're likely heavily funded by Halliburton and can't win their seat back without that money. Morals<money far too often in the Senate.

Date: 2009-10-08 02:59 pm (UTC)
ext_1843: (Default)
From: [identity profile] cereta.livejournal.com
One person argued it was an attack on Halliburton. Uh-huh.

Date: 2009-10-08 03:12 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I'm pretty sure all the women voted Yea:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_in_the_United_States_Senate

This made me love Kay Bailey Hutchinson a little. Though given that Jones's case was brought to the world's attention by her CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN representative (Poe, from the Houston area), I can't believe the rest of them decided this was a partisan issue.

Date: 2009-10-08 03:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tzikeh.livejournal.com
You're absolutely right; I misread part of an article. Thanks for the clear-up; will edit now.

Date: 2009-10-08 03:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] castalianspring.livejournal.com
I was SO not surprised my senators were in those idiotic 30. Already wrote to them but I doubt I'll even get a form letter back about this one.

Date: 2009-10-08 05:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] speaks.livejournal.com
Both of my senators are idiots. I expected little better of Saxby Chambliss. The man is a disgrace. I had hopes for Johnny Isakkson.

Date: 2009-10-08 05:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] castalianspring.livejournal.com
Oh lord, Saxby Chambliss. I'm right near the GA border so we got his ads up here as well. HATE.

Date: 2009-10-08 03:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] magdalene1.livejournal.com
That story makes my hair turn white.

Date: 2009-10-08 06:42 pm (UTC)
ext_6848: (Default)
From: [identity profile] klia.livejournal.com
Thanks, Al! <3 Thank goodness someone finally took some action on this. Why it took 4 years and AF finally getting sworn in is a mystery to me.

Profile

tzikeh: (Default)
tzikeh

August 2022

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930 31   

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 26th, 2026 10:50 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios