Oh, Harry Potter fandom....
Jun. 1st, 2010 09:55 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I was going to title the post "Oh, Harry Potter fandom, never change." But really, I want to title it "Oh, Harry Potter fandom, STFU and go away, you're fucking stupid."
Oh my God.
"YEARS AGO." Ladies and gentlemen, Snape/Hermione fanfiction her friend wrote - YEARS AGO. In fandom. YEARS. And that's called SLASH. And you're stupid if you think otherwise.
Oh my God.
"YEARS AGO." Ladies and gentlemen, Snape/Hermione fanfiction her friend wrote - YEARS AGO. In fandom. YEARS. And that's called SLASH. And you're stupid if you think otherwise.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-02 03:17 am (UTC)Oh my God indeed.
There should be an entrance exam for fandom, with follow-up annual testing.
Question#2: Define slash.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-02 03:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-02 03:50 am (UTC)I want a list nao.
proposals:
"Women writing about men having sex is misogynistic" True or false?
"It's important to figure out the correct OTP in a fandom. Everything else is wrong." True or False?
"Slash stories never have plot." True or false?
Also, and this is based on a similar discussion at Escapade a few years ago:
"Define PWP" (which someone was arguing could be a story without sex, because that's how they chose to define the term)
no subject
Date: 2010-06-02 07:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-02 03:20 pm (UTC)Q.) _______ : rape :: fanfic : wombats
a.) plagiarism
b.) copyright violation
c.) unauthorized remix
d.) all of the above
A.) (d), all of the above. None of these have anything whatsoever to do with rape.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-02 05:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-03 04:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-02 03:17 am (UTC)Okay, that's it; I'm going to bed. Jeebus.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-02 03:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-02 05:30 am (UTC)ooh la la!
Date: 2010-06-02 05:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-02 05:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-02 12:35 pm (UTC)I suppose that Harry Potter fandom is so vast that there are some corners that were never properly acclimated to fandom? I guess? Sheez.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-02 05:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-02 01:10 pm (UTC)LOVE your reply!
no subject
Date: 2010-06-02 05:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-02 01:57 pm (UTC)*rocks harder in rocking chair*
rockin' chair
Date: 2010-06-02 05:35 pm (UTC)Re: rockin' chair
Date: 2010-06-05 04:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-02 03:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-02 05:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-02 05:35 pm (UTC)I'm on the fence about it, but I'll be curious to see how that all shakes out.
And, of course, the whole point of Jack Harkness is that he transcends "labels." :D
no subject
Date: 2010-06-02 06:23 pm (UTC)I want more Jack.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-02 07:29 pm (UTC)