mini-movies in an icon - I give up.
Aug. 9th, 2010 10:16 pmOver the years, I've tried to make mini-movie icons by trial and error--see this post's icon for an example--and they always come out with very choppy movement. The movie plays just fine in QT or VLC, but I get it into Photoshop CS4's animation window and it turns into my icon of El, up there, or this icon of Wilson:
Or the like.
I'm absolutely at my wit's end trying to figure this out for myself. I've looked through endless icon tutorials about how to make mini-movie icons, but none of them ever address the speed and smoothness problems I invariably run into.
Here's an example of a movie clip, a *good* icon made from that movie clip, and my pathetic attempt.
There's the bit. (EEEEEE I love Sherlock! *cough*)
Here's a great animated icon from this scene:

The animated part of the icon is only 75 pixels wide, which helps reduce the file size (lj icons can only be 40k, as we know).
Even keeping my animation 75 pixels wide, with the same number of frames, I couldn't reduce the file size to less than 80k. And, as per usual, my version looks like Sherlock is auditioning for the remake of Chariots of Fire, even though I've set the frame rate to 0 seconds (no delay).
Here's what my attempt looks like:

If anyone has ANY ideas for me, I'd be oh-so-grateful. I'm using Photoshop CS4 to make the icons, and I grab the video from The Usual Places, generally in .avi format.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-10 10:08 am (UTC)And I think the reason yours looks jerky is actually because the frame delay is too small. In an icon, you're working with a limited selection of frames, so you have to slow them down a little bit to get it to look smooth - i.e., if your animation is only using every fifth frame from the original video, then each one has to last five times as long to make it look like it's playing at the right speed. The first icon has a frame delay of 5 rather than zero, and that makes it look much smoother.
(On the plus side, your jerky icon looks fine to me in Internet Explorer, because IE refuses to respect frame rates below 5 and slows the animation down anyway. ...Which is probably why there's some confusion about frame delays out there in tutorial land, actually.)
no subject
Date: 2010-08-10 01:43 pm (UTC)How did you open the original icon as an animation? I can only open it as a finished .gif (single-layer)?
no subject
Date: 2010-08-10 01:52 pm (UTC)Edit: Also, sorry, that delay should be 0.05 - I forgot Animation Shop specifies it in 100ths of a second, duh.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-10 02:26 pm (UTC)grar.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-10 02:39 pm (UTC)Does it still run slow when you save it and open it in the browser? If that doesn't help, I've got no clue, I'm afraid.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-10 03:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-10 06:57 pm (UTC)I Googled around about slow GIF animations from Photoshop and got some hits suggesting other people are having the same problem, but no solutions as yet. :/
Out of curiosity, how fast does this run for you? It's just your icon re-saved in AS and re-uploaded:
...At this stage, I am all out of constructive advice beyond downloading a copy of GIMP and trying to do the animation in that. That is so weird.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-10 09:05 pm (UTC)Still Chariots of Fire. I tried it in Safari - not only is mine slow, but now the *other* one is slow too. I don't much feel like downloading IE...
is GIMP free? Does it work on Macs?
no subject
Date: 2010-08-10 11:57 pm (UTC)Yep! I've never tried using it for animations, but there are various tutorials on Google: this one looks like it might be helpful. It's probably worth a try, anyway, since hey, it's freeware.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-15 05:00 am (UTC)So far, my best ones have been done as follows:
1) Use Quicktime Pro to save a clip from movie as individual frame images.
2) Import the folder of frame images into ImageReady so that each frame is a separate frame.
3) Trim it way the hell down and hope for the best.
So far, these are the best I've managed. As you can see, they're all animation- easier to pick out unnecessary frames than real video.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-15 05:03 am (UTC)#2 - Yeah, that's exactly how I've been doing it; but:
#3 - Animation has far fewer pixels than movies.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-15 05:04 am (UTC)