She's bahleeted her lj.
... does this mean I've arrived? Because seriously, if this can drive someone to bahleet, I just don't know what to say. Is there a card from the Fanmark post in Ces's lj for this situation? "They've bahleeted! You [ ] win / [ ] are vile (check one)."
And who wants to take bets on how soon she'll be back, either under a new lj name, or with the same name, making a triumphant "I AM WOMAN HEAR ME UNBAHLEET" post?
It'd all be vaguely amusing if it weren't so, so old hat.
I'm sure, somewhere, I'm being burned in effigy as a horrid, horrid villain who beat her down with my abusive abject cruelty. I just... If you make fun of someone online, you might expect that they will make fun of you back. If you show up where the fun is being made and comment that you're going to love reading all of the comments, what do you think is going to happen?
I guess being a graying 37-year-old means that you remember what real flames were like, and are baffled by someone fleeing this. Nobody even put match to tinder. Can you have, like, a smelly-candle war?
no subject
Date: 2007-04-28 07:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-28 07:29 pm (UTC)I wonder who holds the lj land-speed record for first-post to bahleetion.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-04-28 07:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-28 07:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-28 07:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-28 08:58 pm (UTC)*is mean*
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-04-28 07:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-28 07:45 pm (UTC)Because, dude, bahleeting your LJ over a minor argument? Now that's pathetic.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-28 07:52 pm (UTC)Oh my gosh, I hadn't thought of that. You're totally right.
Except I don't get it, because I'm American, and we don't understand irony.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-04-28 08:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-28 08:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-29 01:31 am (UTC)I got fandom wanked (fandom wunk?), so I guess some people thought I was the immature loser / pathetic one here. And, you know, that's fine. Humor doesn't often come across well, in text. But... yeah.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-28 08:23 pm (UTC)I mean, hey, if you don't care, that's fine :) I just think you should be aware that's how at least one person reads it.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-28 09:06 pm (UTC)And thank you for being honest with me; I like to hear what people think about what I do and say, because I can learn from it.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-04-28 08:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-28 09:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-28 10:56 pm (UTC)That's it? That's why she deleted her LJ?
So either there's a major missing piece somewhere, or wow, holy overreaction Batman. That was much less exciting than
no subject
Date: 2007-04-29 12:09 am (UTC)Nope. Hers was "friends only" anyway, so even if I wanted to (which I didn't), I couldn't have. And, yes -- it's a can-dish-out/can't-take situation. Her comments over in
The end. Not very exciting. And, as others are saying -- if my post and the comments in it, which were *really* softballs, was enough to send her running, she needs to toughen up a bit.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-04-29 05:19 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-04-28 11:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-29 12:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-29 12:38 am (UTC)http://www.journalfen.net/community/fandom_wank/1076559.html
no subject
Date: 2007-04-29 12:41 am (UTC)I know there's no use going to F_W to clear things up, but sometimes humor doesn't come across in text. The whole "does this mean I've arrived" was a joke about how lame the whole situation was, and I certainly wasn't gloating; I was more having a O_o reaction to the fact that she left over something so trivial as being mocked (rather gently, all things considered).
Ah well. Some may call it karma. I'll live.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-04-29 02:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-29 03:36 am (UTC)Eh. Ultimately, it's no big; some days you're the wanker, some days you're the wankee, some days you just say "so it goes", figure that no matter how you phrase things online, people will misunderstand you and incorrectly infer your tone, have some chocolate cake, and study for your Lit final. :-D
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-04-29 04:14 am (UTC)veryrelatively boring person who lurks a lot. And yes -- I have some gray hairs and am very glad the internet was not up and blasting about during my emo years.no subject
Date: 2007-04-29 04:16 am (UTC)And welcome! I'll check out your lj for certain -- I already see we have Dead Like Me in common (one of my first computer vids *g*)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-04-29 06:01 am (UTC)Now I'm downloading all of the first series.
I HOPE YOU'RE HAPPY!
This is really revenge for that time you and A came to visit me in my crappy basement apartment and I tried to get you to watch Pros from very crappy 6th-generation copies of PAL tapes, isn't it?
no subject
Date: 2007-04-29 01:02 pm (UTC)Stay away from lifein1973 until you've finished the show. There are only two seasons, eight episodes each, and the show is finished - closed canon. I CAN'T WAIT UNTIL YOU SEE IT ALL!!!!!!
Holy crap I'm excited to hear what you think! If you want to email me with your thoughts after like, each episode... that would be okay...
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-05-02 05:11 am (UTC)Since I know you, and since I'm graying and older than you, it's hard to judge the kerfuffle from a distance, but, fwiw, I try not to engage in the "World vs. United States" war-bait. You just can't win at it, no matter how many facts or reasonable opinions or viable counter-arguments you present. It's not an unemotional exchange for the other party, and our role is to accept the pummeling and move on (while, fortunately for us, enjoying many fine U.S. programs that aren't remakes). So, had it been me, I wouldn't have engaged the baleeted chick in the original thread, but I'm known for not being adventurous. Still, the original thread was pretty harmless and stupid, and baleeted chick came across as shrill.
Unfortunately, though, I think that your threads ending up on F_W was predictable after writing about the kerfuffle. (Though I'm frankly surprised this lived up to their standards, because it's so anticlimatic and lacking in drama and OTT-ness, really.) Humor doesn't come across well in text, and, of course, since you as an American are incapable of irony (!), the raw material for interpreting it as bullying American blunt force against hapless, probably-deserved-it-but-still baleeted chick is there if someone wants to look for it. And since people have nothing better to do, they do look for it.
*shrug* I'm not much of a popcorn-eater for this stuff, I guess. Why anyone would want to point and stare at this kind of posting instead of, say, go look at catmacros is beyond me. And if I want to mock young'uns, I just go watch their bad vids on YouTube until I resemble one of klia's icons.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-02 05:14 am (UTC)(no subject)
From: